The
Asus GF4titanium cards are finally here for me to review , and I apologize
to all the techno's out there for not doing a 10 page feature by
feature review on this card but thats not me . With the more standard cooling
set up ( orbish cooler on GPU and no ram sinks ) these two cards are
far lighter than the Leadtek cards I tested two Days ago. Both cards
come with 2 Games , DVD driver and a Asus Driver disc with some nice
utilities , one , the GPU temp monitoring software , does not work
on my Epox MB . When it came to installation , both cards were the
same physical size as there Leadtek brethren , so expect a
snug fit if your short on space . The one thing that jumped out and
grabbed me about the Asus cards was the 3 Year Warranty on them ,
nice , very nice . ASUS
V8440 275mhz core / 550mhz memory Powered
by the powerful NVIDIA® GeForce 4 Ti 4400 GPU
High speed 128MB DDR video memory with 8.8 GB/sec bandwidth
DVI output for easy connectivity to digital flat-panel
displays
Bus Standard: AGP 4X / 2X / 1X
TV-out Connector: One S-VHS mini-DIN and one RCA to mini-DIN
cable
High quality TV output for big screen gaming or presentations
High valued software bundle: ASUS DVD 2000 S/W player and the
hottest 3D games
ASUS V8460 ULTRA
300mhz core / 650mhz memory Powered
by the world's most powerful GPU
NVIDIA® GeForce 4 Ti 4600 GPU
High speed 128MB DDR video memory with 10.4 GB/sec bandwidth
Uses "Immersion Gold Coating" for enhanced
reliability and circuit connections
Special "Copper Fan Sink" cooling solution for
superior overclocking and performance
DVI output for easy connectivity to digital flat-panel
displays
Supports multiple displays
High quality TV output for big screen gaming or presentations
Valuable software bundle: AQUANOX Action Adventure, Midnight
GT Action Racing, Games Showcase Multiple PERFORMANCE: System
: Epox 8k3a , XP1700 @ 9.5x166=1577mhz ( 166/166 ) 20gig ATA100
7200rpm Seagate 256mb pc2700 DDR ram , Win 98SE direct X 8a
Nvidia 28.32 video drivers. ASUS
V8440 Starting
with 3Dmark2001 , the graphics card was left on default settings and
simply changed to Best Performance . All testing will be done the
same as with the Leadtek cards so that results can be compared . 3Dmark2001
Results
ASUS v8440 |
|
Leadtek ti4400 |
|
3Dmark2000
Results
ASUS v8440 |
|
Leadtek ti4400 |
|
So far the results are close enough to not really
mater , so lets se what happens when we use Quake .
Quake Results
Manufacturer |
Graphics Detail |
Normal |
High |
Max |
ASUS v8440 |
800x600 |
233fps |
228fps |
224fps |
Leadtek ti4400 |
800x600 |
233fps |
228fps |
224fps |
ASUS v8440 |
1280x1024 |
192fps |
173fps |
171fps |
Leadtek ti4400 |
1280x1024 |
192fps |
171fps |
169fps |
Again the results are close
enough not to really mater , both cards are equal , and the only way
to see if one is better than the other will be through Overclocking
. OVERCLOCKING: The
Leadtech card got up to 320mhz Core / 630mhz Memory and returned a
3Dmark2001 score of 10763 3Dmarks , whilst the Asus got up to 300mhz
core / 600mhz memory and returned a 3Dmark2001 score of 10719
3Dmarks . The Asus card has no ram sinks , and its GPU cooler is no
where near as large as the wrap around heatsink of the Leadtek ,
which would explain the higher overclock from the Leadtek card. Antialiasing
x2 + Fast Linear-mipmap-linear filtering + Anisotropic filtering . Im doing this
test just to see what sort of performance hit you can expect . 3Dmark2001
ASUS V8440 |
|
Leadtek ti4400 |
|
Ok thats quite the performance hit all right ,
but dare I say still faster than most GF3 cards , so you can have
your cake and eat it so to speak . I personally didnt notice any
greater graphics detail or increased quality , either in Games or
3Dmark2001 from enabling all these features , esp from the software
I currently own , but then the GF4 was made with the future and
games to come in mind . Here we can see the Leadtek take a strong
lead over the Asus card . ASUS
V8460 ULTRA Time
to test the top of the line Asus GF4 card , and I will be comparing
it to the Leadtek GF4 ti4600 , so without wasting time lets see how
it did . 3Dmark2001
Results
Asus v8460 |
|
Leadtek ti4600 |
|
3Dmark2000
Results
Asus v8460 |
|
Leadtek ti4600 |
|
Again ,
the results are very close , but with the Leadtek cards consistently
posting the higher score , how ever marginal it may be . Time to run
Quake . Quake
Results
Manufacturer |
Graphics Detail |
Normal |
High |
Max |
Asus v8460 |
800x600 |
234fps |
229fps |
224fps |
Leadtek ti4600 |
800x600 |
235fps |
230fps |
224fps |
Asus v8460 |
1280x1024 |
201fps |
185fps |
182fps |
Leadtek ti4600 |
1280x1024 |
202fps |
186fps |
182fps |
Again the results are to close to
call a clear winner , so lets see how we go with the overclocking .
OVERCLOCKING: The
Leadtek card went to 325mhz Core / 670mhz Memory and returned a
3Dmark2001 score of 11,037 3Dmarks. The Asus card was taken to
320mhz Core / 670mhz Memory to start with and there were massive
artifacts showing up in 3Dmark2001 so I immediately aborted the
benchmark. Looks like the Asus v8460 is going to need better cooling
if its to achieve reasonable overclocking levels. Conclusion
:
Asus v8440 |
3Dmark2001 = 10,318
3Dmarks |
|
Asus v8460 |
3Dmark2001 = 10,825
3Dmarks |
|
Asus v8440 |
3Dmark2000 = 13,612
3Dmarks |
|
Asus v8460 |
3Dmark2000 = 13,881
3Dmarks |
|
QUAKE
|
Graphics Detail |
Normal |
High |
Max |
Asus v8440 |
800x600 |
233fps |
228fps |
224fps |
Asus v8460 |
800x600 |
234fps |
229fps |
224fps |
Asus v8440 |
1280x1024 |
192fps |
173fps |
171fps |
Asus v8460 |
1280x1024 |
201fps |
185fps |
182fps |
Antialiasing x2 + Fast Linear-mipmap-linear filtering + Anisotropic filtering
.
Asus v8440 |
|
Leadtek ti4400 |
|
Asus v8460 |
|
As you can
see the results are rather close for the v8440 & v8460 Asus
cards , again I had no problems what so ever with either card , both
were blistering fast . As you can see the Gf4 ti4600's dont start to
shine until you start enabling some of the graphics features (
Antialiasing x2+ Fast Linear-mipmap-linear filtering + Anisotropic filtering
) unfortunately I forgot to benchmark the Leadtek ti4600 for this
particular test . Image quality is superb , what else would you
expect from the GF4ti , and personally I would be happy to own
either card . Unfortunately there has to be a winner ,and its
the v8460 . With the Asus v8440 it comes very close
to the v8460 when overclocked , 10,719 3Dmarks vs 10,825 3Dmarks (
2001 ) for the stock benchmark of the v8460 , and with very little
room for overclocking from the v8460 , well I leave it to you to
decide which you want . With some extra cooling added to the v8440 , it just might
outdo its bigger brother the v8460 , as I believe the lack of
cooling for the ram is holding this card back from some serious
overclocking possibilities . Comparing
the Asus cards to the Leadtek cards , I would have to say that at
the moment the Leadtek cards offer better value and performance for
your dollar , but keep in mind that its a small margin , very small
. And the same can be said for the ti4400 vs ti4600 cards , the
performance difference is very small , esp taking the overall scores
into account , and I personally have to favor the much cheaper
ti4400 cards , for there serious value for money and performance
level , when compared to the ti4600 cards . Still if you have to
have the best , then its the ti4600 , and they show there metal when
graphics features and detail levels are increased . Unfortunately
these cards are only on loan to me , and have to go back , so
unfortunately , pushing these cards to the max was out of the
question , and doing any cooling mods were equally out of the
question , would be nice if a Manufacturer sent me a card to review
, this way I could spend a lot more time with it , do more
benchmarks , and tweak the hell out of it , to see what it can do ,
without worrying about doing any damage or even killing the card ,
ouch! , but it happens . So in all honesty I feel a little
uncomfortable , testing someone else's property , lest I do harm to
it . The
last price that I have on the ASUS cards is ASUS
V8440 = $645 ASUS
V8460 = $850 Call
MSY - 9572-4411 for the latest price. I
would like to thank MSY for making this review possible . Matt
Korhonen |